Teen sex not always bad for school performance
By ALICIA CHANG
AP Science Writer
Sun Aug 15, 2010
LOS ANGELES – There's good news for parents who worry that their teenagers' sex lives are affecting their school performance: A provocative new study has found that teens in committed relationships do no better or worse in school than those who don't have sex.
The same isn't true for teens who "hook up." Researchers found that those who have casual flings get lower grades and have more school-related problems compared with those who abstain.
The findings, presented Sunday at a meeting of the American Sociological Association in Atlanta, challenge to some extent assumptions that sexually active teens tend to do poorer in school.
It's not so much whether a teen has sex that determines academic success, the researchers say, but the type of sexual relationship they're engaged in. Teens in serious relationships may find social and emotional support in their sex partners, reducing their anxiety and stress levels in life and in school.
"This should give some comfort to parents who may be concerned that their teenage son or daughter is dating," said sociologist Peggy Giordano of Bowling Green State University, who had no role in the research. Teen sex is "not going to derail their educational trajectories," she said.
Last year, nearly half of high school students reported having sexual intercourse, and 14 percent have had four or more partners, according to a federal survey released this summer.
For the study, University of California, Davis sociologist Bill McCarthy and University of Minnesota sociologist Eric Grodsky analyzed surveys and school transcripts from the largest national follow-up study of teens that began during the 1994-95 academic year. The researchers said not much has changed in terms of when teens first have sex or attitudes toward teen sex in the past decade.
The duo examined how teens' sexual behaviors affected their learning and controlled for factors that might influence their results.
Among the findings:
_Teens in serious relationships did not differ from their abstinent counterparts in terms of their grade-point average, how attached they are to school or college expectations. They were also not more likely to have problems in school, be suspended or absent.
_Compared with virgins, teens who have casual sex had lower GPAs, cared less about school and experienced more problems in school. For example, female teens who have flings had GPAs that were 0.16 points lower than abstinent teens. Male teens who have casual sex had GPAs that were 0.30 points lower than those who do not have sex. Teens who hook up also were at greater risk of being suspended or expelled and had lower odds of expecting to go to college.
_Teens who have sex — whether it's a serious or casual relationship — were at higher risk of being truant and dropping out compared with teens who don't have sex. The researchers said the dropout results should be interpreted with caution because the numbers were small.
"Having sex outside of a romantic relationship may exacerbate the stress youths experience, contributing to problems in school," Grodsky said.
In a statement, the Family Research Council said the study confirms what the group has long advocated about the negative consequences of casual sex.
But the council said it "would not interpret less severe educational impacts on students involved in `committed' sexual relationships as a green light for comprehensive" sex education.
University of Southern California sociologist Julie Albright disagreed. She said it might be time to revamp sex education to "emphasize the importance of relationships and spell out the consequences of casual sex."
The study dispels the notion that all teen sex is bad, said Marie Harvey, professor of public health at Oregon State University.
"The type of relationship really matters. When it comes to sexual behavior, it takes two to tango," said Harvey, adding that safe sex should be practiced to prevent teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases.
'Committed relationship' - I wonder, what does that mean to a 9th grader (in some schools, 9th grade makes it into high school)? What does it mean to a sophmore? A junior? Committed? Hmm, I think i would have said something like - committed means you only have sex with each other.
Yea. I see how that works now ... and so at 14, only have sex with the other person, and that is an anchor for them and may assist them in doing fine in life/school. Yea. I have always marvelled at how serious 14 year olds are. How insightful and respectful. Always thinking about 10 years down the road - family, profession, home ... yep. Committed. In fact, I don't think I have ever known any student in high school who was not insightful, respectful, mature, responsible, thoughtful ... no wonder it works out.
I wonder, if we asked any of those teens who had 4 partners, whether they considered any of them to have occured within a 'committed relationship'. I couldn't imagine otherwise. All high school children are so mature and respectful - the guy would naturally tell his girlfriend it was fine she wouldn't have sex with him that night, he was fine with cuddling and would of course listen to her explain all the issues she was having without of course wanting him to do anything about the problems. Yea, why not - and don't think I care whether kids have sex or not - I don't. I was and I did reasonably ok so I could care less about the sex part - I do care about the agenda behind the studies. It is disingenuous and harmful - far worse than the high school kid 'sleeping' with 3 random people they hooked up with that night.
sex
Subscribe To
Posts
Comments