Even if we follow the very loose application of global warming - that places previously warm would cool and cooler places would warm ... we find Afghanistan, a place normally cool (in the mountains) freezing beyond their normal temperatures (from the last eight years). Denmark - snow and cold - average, in a place that gets snow and cold. Britain - more snow than average and more cold than average, for a place that gets snow and cold. Australia - colder summer than they have experienced in the last decade, in a place that is normally warm / hot. Chile - where summer is in bloom, cool weather has made living easier in the cities. Canada - coldest winter in decades - in a place that is normally cold. California, a place of moderate temperatures - greater cooling period with more rain than last year to date. Most of the US - colder. In fact November will be one of the coldest months on average for the US states. Egypt - a place normally hot, has had cooler temperatures between October and December. We simply do not find sustained warmer temperatures anywhere. We do find colder temperatures everywhere and have for a few years.
These facts are not in debate, they are universally accepted and there is consensus on the data.
So if this is so, a reasonable person would ask - why were over 130 countries represented in Copenhagen - are all of these people dense / clueless / brain dead / gullible?
The answer - no. They have an agenda that is separate from any global warming issue, and for the moment global warming fulfills the role they need it to - the vehicle they have embraced to achieve their desired outcome.
In France - warm beaches now find snow:
global warming
Posts
