I have to admit, I rather enjoyed the meltdown within the Democratic party in 1998, and likewise believe the disintegration of the Republican party was equally well deserved.
However, setting aside justice for the political parties, one event last week seemed to get little notice (this from someone who does not watch TV nor any newspapers per se) - Arlen Specter.
Why didn't the media label him as a traitor, a turn-coat, a rogue, a disloyal and untrustworthy person?
Answer: because he became a Democrat.
There are moments when you truly enjoy watching events unfold - the meltdown in the Democratic party in 1998, the impeachment of one of the most corrupt liars we have had in the White House, followed by the disintegration of the Retardican party - true moments of joy to watch. Equally as important is clarity - we, the people, see the media for what they are - so biased they do not even recognize the fact they are biased - the analysis of Specter leaving the Retardicans, but not of what that means - the disloyal nature of such events.
Understandably, Specter used as an excuse - his party abandoned him. We know that is a lie, for he just joined a party committed to weakening the US worldwide and taxing the American people into poverty.
It is not the same as Democrats who switched to the Republican party after September 11 claiming the Democratic party didn't take their security seriously. THAT is a reasonable and justified argument unlike Specter's feckless claim. Everyone knows why he did it and it had nothing to do with his party abandoning him.
Obama
Subscribe To
Posts
Comments