The argument goes as thus ... some places will have more cold weather while other areas are warmer, some will be wetter while others are dryer, yet all weather issues are the result of global warming.
California received great rains, Vancouver received no snow, Washington D.C. had mammoth snowfalls, while Brazil roasted.
So - let's look around:
Australia - wetter than usual with average temperatures.
California - cooler than average, with greater rainfall than in the last five or six years, but less than other years. Meanwhile in the mountains, more snow than usual. In local mountains, they have had up to 3 feet of snow, whereas in an average year it would be 1-2 feet.
China - COLD and SNOW. Usual.
Afghanistan - cold. Loss of livestock due to freezing on par with 2000-2005.
Canada - Eatsern Canada cold and snow while Western Canada, cooler with less snow.
Northern Canada - colder than in the last decade and more snow.
Russia - freezing and lots of snow.
Britain - snow, snow, and cold.
Germany - average with slightly more snow.
Congo - below average temperatures, by approximately .2 inches above rainfall average.
South Africa - little variation in temperature, more rainfall.
Morrocco (Tangier) - Higher than usual rainfall, temperatures slightly lower than average.
The US - South: Snow. North: Snow. West: Snow. East: Lots of Snow.
Columbia: Slightly above average rainfall levels, temperatures within average for last decade.
Global Warming adhearants will say everything above proves global warming. Sort of like saying - eveyrthing proves God's existence. Why did bad stuff happen - God. Why did good stuff happen - God. Why did nothing happen - God. Why can't we see Him - He doesn't want it. Why did we see Him - He wanted it. The religion of the left refuses to acknowledge the fallacies of its belief system. Unfortunately, global warming does not equal God, and consequently, the belief system will be washed away on the tides of history.
If global warming melts the glaciers that raise sea levels that provides greater moisture - thus the rainfall in Southern California and around the world along with the mammoth snowfalls innundating almost every corner of the US, China, Britain, Afghanistan, Russia ... then global warming explains all, like God. Except it doesn't.
Warming could be responsible for rain, but warming is not responsible for SNOW. SNOW requires cold and cold is not warm no matter how many mittens you put on. SNOW is ice and ice is cold and cold is not global warming. Cold is ICE AGE and the rainfall is all within norms.
Yet the adherants of GW will continue down their path, propounding their faith as they go, door to door, city to city, state to state, country to country, seeking more adherants for their cult.
However, before the apostles of GW bang down my door and hang me for hereasy, I admit that there has been a warming of the earth, and a cooling, a melting, and a freezing. Summer ice is thinner, winter ice however is THICKER and there is MORE of it than there was 20 years ago.
Furthermore, an interesting image below -
What I find interesting about this map, which coincidentally correlates to the NOAA findings and several map texts available for geography courses in college is the ancient coast line. The gulf area shows it best. Florida was at least twice as wide as it is today, at some point in the past (10,000 ya or so). In fact, the gulf was more likely a lake at some point in the ancient past. And so the question of why these areas are now all under water brings us to the snow of the day.
The ice melted - remember the land bridge, Beringia, and the trek from Siberia to Alaska - under water. Why? Water levels rose. Why? Ice melted. Why?
global warmingglobal warming
Posts
