The Washington Post writer Mike DeBonis had a very interesting article on Trump and cyber security. The problem was, it wasn't ... If the WaPo was in a hole during the election, why are you digging a deeper hole? Do you believe by digging a deeper hole it will seem like you're not in a hole? That if you repeat something enough it will be a fact??
Fact: IT IS NOT conclusive that the Russians government hacked anything. There is absolutely NO consensus on this statement. 0. None. Nope. Nada. And for Democrats to rally around this, shows just how political they have made our national security. They are less interested in security and more interested in politics. Sad. They cannot be trusted with anything more than the keys to the local animal control office. Even that is too political.
Fact: Someone hacked into the DNC. Wikileaks says it was NOT a Russian. The person who gave them the information may have actually been a Democrat.
Fact: What other hacking has occurred, maybe have been done by a Russian, but trying to connect a hacker to Putin .... is a step you should be very careful of. Do I think Putin a thoughtful and respectful man ... no. He has ordered the assassination of a number of people or been involved in their murders. But he is not a hacker.
So, the WaPo political piece starts off ....
"President-elect Donald Trump has repeatedly questioned whether critical computer networks can ever be protected from intruders, alarming cybersecurity experts who say his comments could upend more than a decade of national cybersecurity policy and put both government and private data at risk."
Nope. Nada. Not at all.
If I was president, I would provide a couple hundred million more for cyber security/hacking/spying, from my own private secret presidential account on top of everything else the cyber spying department already get. I would support an increase in their budget of 10%, and hire anyone from anonymous and for that matter any other computer criminals in prison, to teach our intel people how to be the best.
But, I would also question whether critical computer networks can ever be protected from intruders ... AND I WOULD NOT BE UPENDING DECADES OF NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY AT ALL!
Wanker
Why? Because it's true. They can't. For all the money we have spent, they can't ensure. That's a FACT!
The writing and journalistic ability of at least three writers at the WaPo ... are no better than a college newspaper 'journalist'. In fact, the student journalist has an excuse.
Fact: IT IS NOT conclusive that the Russians government hacked anything. There is absolutely NO consensus on this statement. 0. None. Nope. Nada. And for Democrats to rally around this, shows just how political they have made our national security. They are less interested in security and more interested in politics. Sad. They cannot be trusted with anything more than the keys to the local animal control office. Even that is too political.
Fact: Someone hacked into the DNC. Wikileaks says it was NOT a Russian. The person who gave them the information may have actually been a Democrat.
Fact: What other hacking has occurred, maybe have been done by a Russian, but trying to connect a hacker to Putin .... is a step you should be very careful of. Do I think Putin a thoughtful and respectful man ... no. He has ordered the assassination of a number of people or been involved in their murders. But he is not a hacker.
So, the WaPo political piece starts off ....
"President-elect Donald Trump has repeatedly questioned whether critical computer networks can ever be protected from intruders, alarming cybersecurity experts who say his comments could upend more than a decade of national cybersecurity policy and put both government and private data at risk."
Nope. Nada. Not at all.
If I was president, I would provide a couple hundred million more for cyber security/hacking/spying, from my own private secret presidential account on top of everything else the cyber spying department already get. I would support an increase in their budget of 10%, and hire anyone from anonymous and for that matter any other computer criminals in prison, to teach our intel people how to be the best.
But, I would also question whether critical computer networks can ever be protected from intruders ... AND I WOULD NOT BE UPENDING DECADES OF NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY AT ALL!
Wanker
Why? Because it's true. They can't. For all the money we have spent, they can't ensure. That's a FACT!
The writing and journalistic ability of at least three writers at the WaPo ... are no better than a college newspaper 'journalist'. In fact, the student journalist has an excuse.
Posts
