Tuesday, February 28, 2017
Liar Liar: Fake News
NBC story -
"Once he assumed the highest office in the land, his first order of business was to close our borders to immigrants and refugees, particularly those from Muslim-majority countries," Langevin, said in a statement. "Diversity makes our nation stronger, and I believe it should be celebrated."
NBC is covering FAKE NEWS, and Democrat Langevin is a LIAR
Trump DID NOT close our border to immigrants and refugees.
Nor did he pick on particularly Muslim-majority countries. Saudi Arabia wasn't on the list. Neither was Afghanistan and the last time I checked they were pretty high up. Indonesia - nope. Not on the list. Lies.
Immigrants are coming from Canada, Britain, South Africa, Brazil, Colombia, Venezuela, Bolivia, Honduras .... clearly the door was NOT shut on all immigrants.
Lies.
And then the lies are covered by NBC and printed on their webpage and further spread ...
Liars covering lies. Fake News.
"Once he assumed the highest office in the land, his first order of business was to close our borders to immigrants and refugees, particularly those from Muslim-majority countries," Langevin, said in a statement. "Diversity makes our nation stronger, and I believe it should be celebrated."
NBC is covering FAKE NEWS, and Democrat Langevin is a LIAR
Trump DID NOT close our border to immigrants and refugees.
Nor did he pick on particularly Muslim-majority countries. Saudi Arabia wasn't on the list. Neither was Afghanistan and the last time I checked they were pretty high up. Indonesia - nope. Not on the list. Lies.
Immigrants are coming from Canada, Britain, South Africa, Brazil, Colombia, Venezuela, Bolivia, Honduras .... clearly the door was NOT shut on all immigrants.
Lies.
And then the lies are covered by NBC and printed on their webpage and further spread ...
Liars covering lies. Fake News.
Monday, February 27, 2017
Constitutional Right to: ... Twitter, Facebook?
Lord help us all if it is a Constitutional right, but apparently the USSC is hearing arguments in a case that may ultimately answer that question.
Lester Packingham, who had pleaded guilty in 2002 to taking indecent liberties with a minor when he was a 21-year-old college student. He received a suspended sentence and two years’ probation and was made to register as a sex offender.
The Justices are debating the right to use these social media platforms, as an aspect of their decision in the case.
Sunday, February 26, 2017
Can't We All Just Get Along
Taken from ...
TheP@disqus_tJeF3O7Dqh
Truth is Truth and Facts are Facts...Whether you like them or not...
I did not write this all and am sorry it is long..Every American should read it..
IF WE COULD JUST FIGURE OUT WHO'S CAUSING THE PROBLEM...
The Shoe Bomber was a Muslim
The Beltway Snipers were Muslims
The Fort Hood Shooter was a Muslim
The underwear Bomber was a Muslim
The U.S.S. Cole Bombers were Muslims
The Madrid Train Bombers were Muslims
The Bafi Nightclub Bombers were Muslims
The London Subway Bombers were Muslims
The Moscow Theater Attackers were Muslims
The Boston Marathon Bombers were Muslims
The Pan-Am flight #93 Bombers were Muslims
The Air France Entebbe Hijackers were Muslims
The Iranian Embassy Takeover, was by Muslims
The Beirut U.S. Embassy bombers were Muslims
The Libyan U.S. Embassy Attack was by Muslims
The Buenos Aires Suicide Bombers were Muslims
The Israeli Olympic Team Attackers were Muslims
The Kenyan U.S, Embassy Bombers were Muslims
The Saudi, Khobar Towers Bombers were Muslims
The Beirut Marine Barracks bombers were Muslims
The Besian Russian School Attackers were Muslims
The first World Trade Center Bombers were Muslims
The Bombay & Mumbai India Attackers were Muslims
The Achille Lauro Cruise Ship Hijackers were Muslims
The September 11th 2001 Airline Hijackers were Muslims
In 2015 there were 452 suicide bomb attacks 450 were Muslims
*** THINK OF IT: ***
Buddhists living with Hindus = No Problem
[I would change the above to SOME PROBLEMS]
Hindus living with Christians = No Problem
Hindus living with Jews = No Problem
Christians living with Shintos = No Problem
Shintos living with Confucians = No Problem
Confucians living with Baha'is = No Problem
Baha'is living with Jews = No Problem
Jews living with Atheists = No Problem
Atheists living with Buddhists = No Problem
Buddhists living with Sikhs = No Problem
Sikhs living with Hindus = No Problem
Hindus living with Baha'is = No Problem
Baha'is living with Christians = No Problem
Christians living with Jews = No Problem
Jews living with Buddhists = No Problem
Buddhists living with Shintos = No Problem
Shintos living with Atheists = No Problem
Atheists living with Confucians = No Problem
Confusians living with Hindus = No Problem
***WHEREAS***
Muslims living with Hindus = Problem
Muslims living with Buddhists = Problem
Muslims living with Christians = Problem
Muslims living with Jews = Problem
Muslims living with Sikhs = Problem
Muslims living with Baha'is = Problem
Muslims living with Shintos = Problem
Muslims living with Atheists = Problem
MUSLIMS LIVING WITH MUSLIMS = BIG PROBLEM
*** SO THIS LEADS TO: ***
They're not happy in Egypt
They're not happy in Libya
They're not happy in Morocco
They're not happy in Iran
They're not happy in Iraq
They're not happy in Yemen
They're not happy in Afghanistan
They're not happy in Pakistan
They're not happy in Syria
They're not happy in Lebanon
They're not happy in Nigeria
They're not happy in Kenya
They're not happy in Sudan
*** SO, WHERE ARE THEY HAPPY? ***
They're happy in Australia
They're happy in England
They're happy in Belgium
They're happy in France
They're happy in Italy
They're happy in Germany
They're happy in Sweden
They're happy in the USA & Canada
They're happy in Norway & India
They're happy in almost every country that is not Islamic!
And who do they blame? Not Islam. Not their leadership. Not themselves.
THEY BLAME THE COUNTRIES THEY ARE HAPPY IN!!
AND THEY WANT TO CHANGE THE COUNTRIES THEY ARE HAPPY IN, TO BE LIKE THE COUNTRIES THEY CAME FROM, WHERE THEY WERE UNHAPPY!
Friday, February 24, 2017
Trans - lost?
Cox told The Hollywood Reporter on Thursday that she feels like "our government is not acknowledging the humanity of trans
people, not acknowledging that we are who we say we are."
So, perhaps a little light on that drama is appropriate -
The Trump administration Wednesday revoked federal guidelines issued by former President Barack Obama ... in May ... that allowed public school students to use restrooms and other facilities corresponding to their gender identity.
Now how does that deny the humanity of anyone in light of the following ....
Obama's directive did not "undergo any formal public process" or explain how the directive was "consistent with the express language of Title IX," the federal law outlawing sex discrimination in education and activities.
In English - he wrote it up without any thought or process to its implementation.
Instead, the argument goes ... "This is an issue best solved at the state and local level," Education Secretary Betsy DeVos said. "Schools, communities, and families can find -- and in many cases have found -- solutions that protect all students."
And further -
"Congress, state legislatures, and local governments are in a position to adopt appropriate policies or laws addressing this issue," Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a statement. "The Department of Justice remains committed to the proper interpretation and enforcement of Title IX and to its protections for all students, including LGBTQ students, from discrimination, bullying, and harassment.”
In a letter to the nation's schools, the Justice and Education departments said the earlier guidance "has given rise to significant litigation regarding school restrooms and locker rooms."
And as for treatment of trans students -
Anti-bullying safeguards would not be affected by the change, according to the letter. "All schools must ensure that all students, including LGBT students, are able to learn and thrive in a safe environment."
So, again, where is the humanity being denied. And isn't the state, your town where you directly elect a Mayor or City Council or Board for the school, isn't that a very simple and easy place to begin to help all students.
Why does it need to come from the top down, where the top didn't think through before acting.
I really don't believe this is useful, but -
The argument about federal versus states is a very old debate in which over 600,000 men died before this issue was seemingly resolved. We call that event the Civil War.
Forcing an issue from the top, without any awareness of the implications and consequences on all levels, is not a prudent or responsible action. Instead, beginning with your local school board members who were elected by fewer than a few thousand votes, you can make a change. Or your city council who were elected by ten thousand or less votes, or your mayor who really wants another 100-500 votes you could provide if they support your cause. Or the state legislators who were probably elected by less than a few thousand votes. That process is easier to work through. It is localized and with people who know the situation well, in your community, rather than someone far removed with no understanding of anything.
Some businesses, like Apple could provide multiple bathrooms to anyone if they chose, WITHOUT federal guidance. Local decisions are better left to the people you can most directly affect by your vote. It works better. In cases where you are the minority, work up the chain to governor. In the state of California, I am sure the legislature will support any cause or mission and will grant you whatever it is you believe fair.
However, not all states are like that. In cases such as this, legal requirements rising from actions before the US Supreme Court will provide direction.
Trump's removal of a decision from 10 months ago is not equivalent to dismantling civil rights actions from 1964. It was simply DIRECTION, not a DEMAND to do. Get real.
So, perhaps a little light on that drama is appropriate -
The Trump administration Wednesday revoked federal guidelines issued by former President Barack Obama ... in May ... that allowed public school students to use restrooms and other facilities corresponding to their gender identity.
Now how does that deny the humanity of anyone in light of the following ....
Obama's directive did not "undergo any formal public process" or explain how the directive was "consistent with the express language of Title IX," the federal law outlawing sex discrimination in education and activities.
In English - he wrote it up without any thought or process to its implementation.
Instead, the argument goes ... "This is an issue best solved at the state and local level," Education Secretary Betsy DeVos said. "Schools, communities, and families can find -- and in many cases have found -- solutions that protect all students."
And further -
"Congress, state legislatures, and local governments are in a position to adopt appropriate policies or laws addressing this issue," Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a statement. "The Department of Justice remains committed to the proper interpretation and enforcement of Title IX and to its protections for all students, including LGBTQ students, from discrimination, bullying, and harassment.”
In a letter to the nation's schools, the Justice and Education departments said the earlier guidance "has given rise to significant litigation regarding school restrooms and locker rooms."
And as for treatment of trans students -
Anti-bullying safeguards would not be affected by the change, according to the letter. "All schools must ensure that all students, including LGBT students, are able to learn and thrive in a safe environment."
So, again, where is the humanity being denied. And isn't the state, your town where you directly elect a Mayor or City Council or Board for the school, isn't that a very simple and easy place to begin to help all students.
Why does it need to come from the top down, where the top didn't think through before acting.
I really don't believe this is useful, but -
The argument about federal versus states is a very old debate in which over 600,000 men died before this issue was seemingly resolved. We call that event the Civil War.
Forcing an issue from the top, without any awareness of the implications and consequences on all levels, is not a prudent or responsible action. Instead, beginning with your local school board members who were elected by fewer than a few thousand votes, you can make a change. Or your city council who were elected by ten thousand or less votes, or your mayor who really wants another 100-500 votes you could provide if they support your cause. Or the state legislators who were probably elected by less than a few thousand votes. That process is easier to work through. It is localized and with people who know the situation well, in your community, rather than someone far removed with no understanding of anything.
Some businesses, like Apple could provide multiple bathrooms to anyone if they chose, WITHOUT federal guidance. Local decisions are better left to the people you can most directly affect by your vote. It works better. In cases where you are the minority, work up the chain to governor. In the state of California, I am sure the legislature will support any cause or mission and will grant you whatever it is you believe fair.
However, not all states are like that. In cases such as this, legal requirements rising from actions before the US Supreme Court will provide direction.
Trump's removal of a decision from 10 months ago is not equivalent to dismantling civil rights actions from 1964. It was simply DIRECTION, not a DEMAND to do. Get real.
1984: Doublespeak. Up is down, Yes is No.
So much is made of Donald Trump's unchecked facts. And to be fair and honest, and transparent, I agree for the most part. Yet what I have noticed over the last two months is lies, slander, and innuendo by academics, media, and liberals against anything and everything related to Donald Trump. It is obsessive, hate-filled, and blind. It is intolerant hate, and this is not news, real or fake to anyone. It is very clear. It is also not limited to liberals, for their are some conservatives in the Republican party who so loathe Trump, they now find themselves siding with the most loathe some of humans - people who preach intolerance, hate, violence, and an end to free speech - liberals.
You lost. Get over it. With illegal voting, although not millions probably, but still with that help, the help of people who said 'never trump', and the apathy of others all helping the vote count for Her, he still won. He said he was going to do X, Y, Z, and surprise surprise, he is doing X Y and Z along with A, B, C, D, E, and F, with plans for G, H,I,J,K later. I suspect L, M, N, O will be reserved until his next term if he were to run again. This is what voters want. Someone who says and does, not someone who blames and doesn't do. And surprise, when he blames the media he isn't exaggerating - enemy of the people? No, but certainly not working toward the sovereignty and independence of the American people.
The people who voted for Trump will do so again, and after he has demonstrated he is not the evil-doer the liberals say he is, some from the left side will vote for him/support him next time. You can't win, because your message is one of division. His message isn't one of division, his is one of unification. Your message is divisive. He says America is for Americans, for those people who want to be American, who come here to be part of this great experiment in human history. For those who come legally, and follow our laws and seek to be Americans - all of this is for them. That is NOT divisive. Since when is supporting ones nation and the sovereignty and independence of ones nation and people divisive?
Your message - which is entirely about division and hate, is exactly that - destructive and divisive. Sad.
And voters see this. They really do. You think because 10,000 protest here and 1000 scream there, and 5,000 cry over there - that the nation is waking up. You made that mistake in November. The 40+ million who support him are not having fits, committing crimes en masse, or threatening an end to order by their intolerant attitudes toward government and policy. They will vote. AND others will also. The only way you could pull off a coup is by getting illegals to vote, and I suspect in the next 4 years we will see voter reform to prevent much of that! I know it hurts, but winning by fraud, by deception, by division, isn't winning - it's cheating! And it kills truth.
Oh, the Russians, I know. But according to every poll/study done, NOTHING the Russians never did, helped Her. And if it did, why hasn't SHE said it has. Instead she has blamed everyone else BUT the Russians. Simpletons who still believe the Russians hacked an email account are idiots, in the truest sense of the word.
What I have noticed in the last 3-4 weeks is that our country really does have a serious, serious, serious, very serious illegal immigration issue. Throughout the country cities and states say they will 'protect' illegals. But what about law. They came here illegally, violating state and federal laws in doing so. They are not fleeing (most) anything worse than what those miserably impoverished states they flee from have always been. You don't protest the conditions in Mexico that force people to flee. You instead fly the Mexican flag. You offer sanctuary and protection flouting laws our government established long before Trump. You want to hire illegals, and several companies have said they want to, to protect them. OMG.
Honestly. Spend your bloody energy saving their wretched countries from the inhuman conditions the people live in so they don't come here. Stop hurting the American taxpayer.
Americans haven't quite figured out all this tax stuff yet, but I promise. That will come.
In the meantime, I will post some deets about that topic ignored by media in favor of depicting Trump as Satan or his aide.
However, not at this time. I have things to do. Later.
You lost. Get over it. With illegal voting, although not millions probably, but still with that help, the help of people who said 'never trump', and the apathy of others all helping the vote count for Her, he still won. He said he was going to do X, Y, Z, and surprise surprise, he is doing X Y and Z along with A, B, C, D, E, and F, with plans for G, H,I,J,K later. I suspect L, M, N, O will be reserved until his next term if he were to run again. This is what voters want. Someone who says and does, not someone who blames and doesn't do. And surprise, when he blames the media he isn't exaggerating - enemy of the people? No, but certainly not working toward the sovereignty and independence of the American people.
The people who voted for Trump will do so again, and after he has demonstrated he is not the evil-doer the liberals say he is, some from the left side will vote for him/support him next time. You can't win, because your message is one of division. His message isn't one of division, his is one of unification. Your message is divisive. He says America is for Americans, for those people who want to be American, who come here to be part of this great experiment in human history. For those who come legally, and follow our laws and seek to be Americans - all of this is for them. That is NOT divisive. Since when is supporting ones nation and the sovereignty and independence of ones nation and people divisive?
Your message - which is entirely about division and hate, is exactly that - destructive and divisive. Sad.
And voters see this. They really do. You think because 10,000 protest here and 1000 scream there, and 5,000 cry over there - that the nation is waking up. You made that mistake in November. The 40+ million who support him are not having fits, committing crimes en masse, or threatening an end to order by their intolerant attitudes toward government and policy. They will vote. AND others will also. The only way you could pull off a coup is by getting illegals to vote, and I suspect in the next 4 years we will see voter reform to prevent much of that! I know it hurts, but winning by fraud, by deception, by division, isn't winning - it's cheating! And it kills truth.
Oh, the Russians, I know. But according to every poll/study done, NOTHING the Russians never did, helped Her. And if it did, why hasn't SHE said it has. Instead she has blamed everyone else BUT the Russians. Simpletons who still believe the Russians hacked an email account are idiots, in the truest sense of the word.
What I have noticed in the last 3-4 weeks is that our country really does have a serious, serious, serious, very serious illegal immigration issue. Throughout the country cities and states say they will 'protect' illegals. But what about law. They came here illegally, violating state and federal laws in doing so. They are not fleeing (most) anything worse than what those miserably impoverished states they flee from have always been. You don't protest the conditions in Mexico that force people to flee. You instead fly the Mexican flag. You offer sanctuary and protection flouting laws our government established long before Trump. You want to hire illegals, and several companies have said they want to, to protect them. OMG.
Honestly. Spend your bloody energy saving their wretched countries from the inhuman conditions the people live in so they don't come here. Stop hurting the American taxpayer.
Americans haven't quite figured out all this tax stuff yet, but I promise. That will come.
In the meantime, I will post some deets about that topic ignored by media in favor of depicting Trump as Satan or his aide.
However, not at this time. I have things to do. Later.
Tuesday, February 21, 2017
Terror: 1 Million Pounds for Terror: Thanks to the people who care! Responsibility all around.
British man who launched Isil suicide attack was Guantanamo Bay detainee awarded £1m compensation
A British Islamic State fighter who
carried out a suicide bombing in Iraq this week is a former Guantanamo
Bay detainee who was paid £1 million compensation by the government.
Jamal al-Harith, a Muslim convert born Ronald Fiddler who detonated a car bomb at an Iraqi army base near Mosul, was released from the US detention camp in 2004 and successfully claimed compensation after saying British agents knew or were complicit in his mistreatment.
He was freed following intense lobbying by Tony Blair’s Labour government.
Jamal al-Harith, a Muslim convert born Ronald Fiddler who detonated a car bomb at an Iraqi army base near Mosul, was released from the US detention camp in 2004 and successfully claimed compensation after saying British agents knew or were complicit in his mistreatment.
He was freed following intense lobbying by Tony Blair’s Labour government.
Al-Harith,
who used the nom de guerre Abu-Zakariya al-Britani, entered Syria via
Turkey in 2014 to join Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, leading to
questions at the time about the monitoring of terrorist suspects.
It also raised the possibility that compensation money paid by British taxpayers had been handed on by him to Isil.
Earlier this week Isil released an image of him sitting inside the bomb car grinning broadly, with wires and what may be a detonation button in the background.
A statement released by the terrorist group said: “The martyrdom-seeking brother Abu Zakariya al-Britani - may Allah accept him - detonated his explosives-laden vehicle on a headquarters of the Rafidhi army and its militias in Tal Kisum village, southwest of Mosul.”
It also raised the possibility that compensation money paid by British taxpayers had been handed on by him to Isil.
Earlier this week Isil released an image of him sitting inside the bomb car grinning broadly, with wires and what may be a detonation button in the background.
A statement released by the terrorist group said: “The martyrdom-seeking brother Abu Zakariya al-Britani - may Allah accept him - detonated his explosives-laden vehicle on a headquarters of the Rafidhi army and its militias in Tal Kisum village, southwest of Mosul.”
_________________________
There shouldn't be a question ... it is self-answered ... that money was used for terrorism, to kill innocent human beings.
Sweden AGAIN
Police investigator Peter Springare isn’t likely to be among those mocking President Trump for his remarks about refugees in Sweden.
Trump’s comments during a Florida campaign rally on Saturday – which some took as a misstatement about a supposed terror attack – dovetail with what Springare has been seeing during a typical week in Orebro, Sweden. Five rapes, three assaults, a pair of extortions, blackmail, an attempted murder, violence against police and a robbery made up Springare’s caseload for a five-day period earlier this month, according to a Feb. 3 Facebook post he wrote. The suspects were all from Muslim-majority countries – Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Somalia and Turkey – save for one Swedish man nabbed in a drug-related case.
“Mohammed, Mahmod, Ali, again and again,” Springare wrote of those arrested.
Springare, who was briefly investigated for possible hate crime incitement based on his post, managed to elucidate what Trump only hinted at during a Florida campaign speech – somewhat opaquely.
Swedish police investigator Peter Springare is in trouble after this Facebook post went viral. (Translated for ZeroHedge.com)
“You look at what’s happening last night in Sweden,” Trump said. “Sweden. Who would believe this? Sweden. They took in large numbers. They’re having problems like they never thought possible.”
Many analysts took issue with Trump’s “last night” framing, and immediately compared the line to recent misstatements by Trump spokespeople, such as counselor Kellyanne Conway’s infamous “Bowling Green Massacre” blunder.
But Trump explained on Twitter late Sunday that he was only referring to a Fox News segment that aired on Friday night’s “Tucker Carlson Tonight” dealing with the Swedish refugee crime.
“It seems like we may be missing the point of the story, which is there has been a massive social cost associated with the refugee policies and the immigration policies of Western Europe,” Carlson said on “Fox & Friends” on Monday morning.
He added: “Fifty years of immigration policy is coming to flower in Europe. We’re not paying any attention. We’re not drawing any of the obvious lessons from it. It's not working. That's the real point here. ”
Trump tweeted again on Monday morning, blasting media outlets that failed to report on Sweden's migrant crime epidemic.
"Give the public a break - The FAKE NEWS media is trying to say that large scale immigration in Sweden is working out just beautifully. NOT!" Trump wrote.
Fox News reached out to the Swedish Embassy for comment, however, the building was closed for President's Day. The embassy did tweet back to Trump on Sunday: "We look forward to informing the US administration about Swedish immigration and integration policies."
We look forward to informing the US administration about Swedish immigration and integration policies. twitter.com/realdonaldtrum…
Last month, the police chief for the southern Swedish city of Malmo issued a desperate plea for help curtailing a plague of attempted murders, beatings and rapes. About 32 percent of Malmo’s occupants are migrants, although it is not clear what role migrants play in the crime wave.
“We cannot do it on our own,” Chief Stefan Sinteus wrote in an open letter about the “upward spiral of violence.”
And Sinteus is not merely dealing with typical crimes that any modern city would witness.
Malmo had 52 hand grenade attacks in 2016 alone, a jump from 48 attacks in 2015, according to figures provided by the Swedish Police Authority.
Nationwide, the terror threat level is at “elevated” and police believe at least 300 Swedish nationals have travelled to Syria and Iraq for jihadi training. On Feb. 11, a Swedish man and a Danish man were arrested in Turkey, suspected of plotting to carry out attacks in Europe. Tofik Saleh, a 38-year-old Swedish citizen of Iraqi origin, had been training with ISIS since 2014, officials said.
On the same day Springare posted his screed, a Swedish court turned over to Belgium evidence – seized in Malmo – in connection with the 2016 Brussels terror attacks, prosecutors said.
Sweden has taken in 650,000 asylum-seekers during the past 15 years – including 163,000 in 2015 alone, The Spectator reported. Of those refugees, 35,000 were unaccompanied children – or at least claimed to be. The children – mostly males from Afghanistan and Somalia – are only identified as minors by the age the applicant gives. The only time an applicant-provided age is rejected is if it’s “obviously” untrue, though there’s no clear definition of “obviously.” The Spectator interviewed asylum-seekers who admitted to lying about their age to improve their chances of avoiding deportation.
Carlson warned this mass influx of migrants, many of whom are uneducated and jobless, has begun to alter the face – and crime rates – of countries such as Sweden.
“[The integration policy] hasn’t worked very well, at all,” Carlson said. “And it’s in the process of totally changing these ancient cultures into something different and much more volatile and much more threatening, so what are the lessons we should draw from this? That’s the conversation we should have.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Subscribe To
Posts
All Comments